1. Common Alloying Metals in Karat Gold

In commercial jewelry alloys, the most common non-gold metals are silver, copper, nickel, and zinc. These metals account for the majority of standard karat gold alloys. Cadmium may appear in older jewelry and legacy solders, while palladium and platinum are used in higher-grade white gold alloys.

Alloy Type Typical Composition Refining Relevance
Yellow Gold Gold, silver, copper, sometimes zinc Moderate oxidation from copper; lower zinc risk than white gold
Rose / Red Gold Gold and copper, with silver as balance Higher copper means more oxide scale and slag contribution
Nickel White Gold Gold, nickel, zinc, copper High zinc content makes this a major vapor-loss category
Palladium White Gold Gold and palladium, often with silver Higher melting behavior; palladium oxidation/discoloration requires care
Green Gold / Electrum Gold and silver Usually lower oxide risk unless contaminated with old solder or cadmium

2. Thermal Behavior of Common Alloying Metals

Metal Melting Point Boiling Point Behavior During Karat Gold Melting
Gold 1,064°C 2,856°C Does not oxidize in air, but its volatility increases in the presence of metallic impurities.
Silver 962°C 2,162°C Does not form a stable oxide at melt temperature; dissolves oxygen and may spit on solidification.
Copper 1,084°C 2,562°C Oxidizes readily and is the dominant oxide source in karat gold scale.
Zinc 419.5°C 907°C Actively volatilizes at karat gold melt temperatures and forms zinc oxide fume.
Nickel 1,455°C 2,913°C Oxidizes to nickel oxide but does not vaporize meaningfully at karat melt temperatures.
Palladium 1,555°C 2,973°C Can oxidize/discolor above roughly 400°C; controlled or inert heating is preferred.
Platinum 1,768°C 3,825°C Effectively inert to oxidation at jewelry-relevant temperatures.
Cadmium 321°C 767°C Volatilizes early and produces acutely toxic cadmium oxide fume.

3. Does Oxidation Have Mass?

Yes. Oxides weigh more than the starting metal because oxygen from the atmosphere becomes chemically bound to the metal. For example, copper gains mass when it forms copper oxide because oxygen is added to the reaction product.

Example: Copper oxidizing to cupric oxide gains approximately 25% mass because oxygen becomes part of the oxide compound.

Three Refining Scenarios

Scenario What Happens Refining Impact
Oxide stays in slag or melt Copper oxide, nickel oxide, or palladium oxide reports into the flux layer and is left behind in the crucible Potentially recoverable through reduction or chemical processing
Oxide volatilizes Zinc or cadmium leaves as oxide fume True mass loss through the hood or exhaust system
Gas dissolves without stable oxidation Silver dissolves oxygen and releases it on cooling Causes porosity or spitting, but not a true refiner loss

4. Which Metals Vaporize During Karat Gold Melting?

Primary Volatile Losses

  • Cadmium
  • Zinc

These are the dominant real-world vapor-loss metals in karat scrap.

Secondary Situational Losses

  • Mercury
  • Antimony
  • Bismuth
  • Arsenic
  • Lead from solder contamination

Minor or Essentially Non-Volatile

  • Gold
  • Nickel
  • Palladium
  • Platinum
  • Iron
  • Cobalt

Zinc and cadmium are the major practical concerns because their boiling points fall below or near common karat gold melting temperatures. Zinc is especially important in white gold alloys and solder-bearing scrap.

5. Expected Melt Loss by Lot Size

For clean, segregated karat gold scrap melted with proper flux, minimum effective temperature, and clean pouring practice, a competent refiner should generally expect 0.5% to 2.0% total lot weight loss.

Lot Size Expected Loss Absolute Loss Operational Notes
50 grams 1% to 3% 0.5 g to 1.5 g Surface effects dominate; crucible wetting, flux retention, and pour technique matter more.
100 grams 0.75% to 2% 0.75 g to 2 g Efficient torch melt size; suitable for representative assay bar.
250 grams 0.5% to 1.5% 1.25 g to 3.75 g Strong size range for torch or small induction melts.
500 grams to 1 kilogram 0.3% to 1.2% 1.5 g to 12 g Induction melting preferred; composition dominates loss.
2 kilograms and above 0.2% to 1% Variable Commercial refiner scale; controlled atmosphere can reduce loss further.
Aurora operating baseline: plan on 1% to 2% melt loss for normal mixed karat scrap unless the lot is unusually clean, unusually contaminated, or heavy in white gold and solder.

6. Zinc-Driven Loss Model

Zinc is the most important ordinary alloying metal for melt-loss prediction. A 10K or 14K white gold lot with 6% to 8% zinc can lose substantially more weight than a low-zinc yellow gold lot.

Example: If a lot contains 6% zinc and 40% to 60% of that zinc vaporizes during open melting, the lot can lose approximately 2.4% to 3.6% of total input weight from zinc loss alone, before mechanical loss, oxide-rich flux retention, crucible holdback, or spillage.

7. Factors That Increase Melt Loss

  1. High zinc content: the largest routine driver of mass loss.
  2. Cadmium-bearing legacy material: rare but dangerous and highly volatile.
  3. Poor flux coverage: thin flux allows zinc to escape rapidly.
  4. Excessive time at temperature: every extra minute above liquidus increases loss.
  5. Temperature overshoot: torch hot spots can dramatically increase vapor pressure.
  6. Dirty scrap: oils, oxides, organics, and silicates increase slag and carryover.
  7. Contaminated crucibles: previous silver, pewter, or base-metal melts can distort results.
  8. Poor pour discipline: splashing, wall retention, disturbing the flux layer, or dragging flux/oxide residue into the pour can create avoidable loss.

8. Practical Refining Guidelines

Karat gold melts are not typically skimmed; instead, the melt is protected under flux, poured cleanly, and oxide-rich flux is left behind.

9. Customer-Facing Melt Loss Framing

On a typical mixed karat gold scrap lot, Aurora Gold & Silver expects approximately 1% to 2% melt loss under normal shop conditions. Clean yellow gold may perform better, while white gold, zinc-bearing scrap, old solder, and legacy cadmium-bearing material may produce wider losses.

Melt loss is not random. It is driven by alloy composition, oxidation, vaporization, flux practice, temperature control, and operator discipline. Over time, measuring every melt creates a practical yield database that improves pricing, accountability, and refining accuracy.